Novelty screening result Patentability Grader · Patsnap Eureka
Patsnap Eureka Patentability Grader

Know if it’s patentable
before you file.

Grade your invention’s patentability in 90 seconds and see exactly what to fix before you file. Free.

1What it is 2What’s new
· This line is where novelty is decided.

Your description is never used for model training

Or start from a real example
What comes back in 90 seconds
A graded assessment every dimension shown and weighted, not a black-box number
56/100
Partially anticipated
0 · ANTICIPATED5580100 · NOVEL
Feature novelty40% 50
Closest-reference distance25% 50
Combination risk20% 45
Claimable space15% 95
The closest prior art ranked, with figures, the matching passage and an X/Y call
79%
US 9,876,543 B2
Charging case with magnetic earbud alignment
a magnet disposed adjacent each cavity to align the earbud in a predetermined orientation, and a rechargeable cell within the housing
PS-X · likely cited against claim 1 8 references retained · 2 tagged PS-Y for §103
What to fix before filing which feature belongs in claim 1, and where the unclaimed space is
Narrow independent claim 1. Three of your six features are disclosed by the same reference.
Move the contact geometry up. Your cavity-floor arrangement is the cleanest distinction in the set, so it belongs in claim 1.
Add a method claim. No reference claims the align-then-charge sequence. That is unclaimed space and it is cheap to take.
Patsnap Eureka IP

Get the report, not just the grade

The grade above is a free screen on the top 5 documents. These two are the deliverables: every candidate compared feature by feature, produced by an AI agent in hours rather than the days a search firm takes.

Get a Novelty Search report Every candidate compared, 174 jurisdictions, source-linked
Get a Freedom-to-Operate report In-force rights in the markets you are launching into

Both cite every document they rely on, so an attorney can check the reasoning rather than take it on trust.

Searching prior art

DEMO SPEED
Step 1 of 7 · Parsing your disclosure 0%
0
Records scanned
0
Candidates retained
0
Feature comparisons
0 · Fully disclosed5580100 · Nothing found

Show the working · four dimensions, the arithmetic, the evidence map and the four retrieval routes
Every dimension is a count off the evidence map below. Nothing here is a model opinion you can't check.
Evidence map
Where the documents came from
Closest prior art
5 more references retained

Unlock the 5 remaining references

Create a free Eureka account to see all 8 with element-level comparison, full PS-X / PS-Y / PS-A tagging and the complete search-strategy appendix.

Open all patents
Search strategy the AI used
Assessment
What to do next

Novelty Search Agent hits 81% on X-documents, versus 32% for ChatGPT-o3 and 9% for DeepSeek-R1.

What this grade is not. This is a free screening run, and it is bounded on purpose. It retrieves along four routes (semantic patents, three rounds of Boolean patents, papers and web sources), then compares your features against the top 5 documents only, at the level of the text you wrote rather than against a full claim set. Candidates beyond the top 5 are retrieved but not compared, and no search can see unpublished applications inside the 18-month window. The four dimensions assess novelty (§102) and flag combination risk (§103); a full opinion also needs §101 eligibility and §112 sufficiency, which turn on your actual claim language. A high score here is not a clearance to file, and a low score is not a rejection. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Run the full Novelty Search in Eureka to compare every candidate rather than the top 5, across 174 jurisdictions and the full non-patent literature. Or take this output to your patent attorney.

Generated by the Patsnap Eureka Patentability Grader. A free screening run: four retrieval routes, deep comparison on the top 5 documents only. Not legal advice. eureka.patsnap.com